Skip to main content

Big boost for home buyers: Projects received part occupation certificate to come under MahaRERA

In an order that would set a precedent for future cases related to part occupation certificate, the MahaRERA (Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority) in an interim order dated September 12 has held that the project will come under its jurisdiction even though it has received part occupation certificate.
In its order, MahaRERA implied that having part occupation certificate means the project is not completed. The ruling is very significant as getting part occupation certificate for the projects is quite a trend among the developers in Maharashtra.
“This will be a welcome order for the home buyers. The projects with part occupation certificate will now be considered as ongoing projects. This means, they will now come under the purview of RERA,” said Apurva Kanvinde, senior associate, Juris Corp.
The order was passed in a complaint filed by Haresh Jethmal Asher against Bellissimo Crown Buildmart, which is a subsidiary of Lodha Developers.
The buyer had purchased a flat on the 13th floor of ‘Evoq’ building situated at New Cuff Parade along with three parking spaces through a letter of allotment on May 22, 2017 on the basis of the booking form dated April 8, 2015.
The complainant alleged that the builder had advertised in the newspapers that the possession of the flat would be given by December 2016 with all amenities. Thereafter, the buyer claims he was informed by the builder that the possession will be given by April, 2017.
The buyer said the builder did not provide a copy of occupation certificate and therefore, he could not get the loan and pay the entire consideration before the application of Goods and Services Tax (GST) in the state.
He claimed to have suffered loss and damages due to the incorrect statement made by the developer and hence, prayed for a refund of his entire amount with interest.

           HOUSING INDUSTRY SOFTWARE
The developer claimed that he received part occupation certificate on June 8, 2017 from Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) for 1-40th floor of B wing and hence, it’s not registered with MahaRERA. And as the complainant booked the flat on 13th floor, the authority has no jurisdiction to entertain this complaint.
According to Section 3(2) of RERA act, the project is exempted from registration, if the developer has received completion certificated before the commencement of the act. RERA came into effect from May 1, 2017.
While hearing the case, B.D. Kapadnis, member and adjudicating officer of MahaRERA, held that part occupation certificate does not exempt project from registration.
“The part occupancy certificate impliedly demonstrates that the building/project is not completed. It is issued on the basis of part completion certificate given by the private architect that too on the indemnity of the owner/constructor. Hence, it indicates that the project is not completed as per the sanctioned building plan, layout plan and their specifications. Section 3 (2) of RERA exempts the phase/part of the project/building from its registration.”
“However, I find that the other requirements of RERA can be complied with only on completion of the entire project such as handing over the, amenities to the society of the allottees, execution of their conveyance in favour of the society etc. Many a times, the other amenities and services promised may be provided on the completion of the last phase of the project.”
“Therefore, the interest of allottees of the entire project is involved in the completion of the whole project in its entirety. It would be anomalous to hold that some part of the building is covered by RERA's jurisdiction and other part is exempted. Hence, in my opinion, the entire project comes under the jurisdiction of RERA so long as its occupancy certificate is not issued by the competent authority. This leads me to hold that though the respondents have received the part occupancy certificate including that of 13 floor, where the complainant’s booked flat is situated, the jurisdiction of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority is not lost.” reads the interim order passed by B.D. Kapadnis.
"We intend to file an appeal against the order before the appellate authority," said Lodha Developers spokesperson.


Source: cnbctv18



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RERA Self Declaration to be submitted by the Promoters to the Bank

For Registration visit  www.GoRERA.com (Only 11 days left) Circular No. 3/ 2017 No.MahaRERA/Secy/File   No .27 /79/2017 Date : 0 7 th June 20 1 7 . Self  Declaration to be submitted  by  Promoters to the   Bank. Whereas the MahaRERA Authority, under section 37 of the RERA Act, 2016 and Regulation 38 of the MahaRERA (General) Regulations 2017 is vested with the powers to issue directions and orders to promoters, real estate agents and allottees from time to time for effective implementation of the Act and to achieve the underlying object behind the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Whereas the promoter under section 4(2)(l)(D) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 is required to deposit seventy per cent of the amounts realised for the real estate project from the allott ees in a separate account  to be maintained  in...

Mumbai: 150 homebuyers register a complaint with MahaRERA against real estate project at Mira Road

Nearly 150 homebuyers have registered a complaint with the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) against a real estate project at Mira Road which has been stalled for the last four years. Buyers said that the construction work of the project was affected after a dispute among the directors of the company, Kashmira Ceramics Products. According to one of the buyers, the project named Tanvi Eminence, is divided in two phases. It was announced in 2010 with 500 flats and the developer had promised to deliver the flats by 2016, however, the project got stalled in 2013 after a fallout amongst the directors. The buyers will be meeting Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and state chief secretary in order to take action against the developer. Buyers alleged each of them had paid an advance of nearly Rs 25 lakh to the developer while booking the flats and most of them are now paying off their loans. Although, only 150 buyers have lodged complaints, there are more than 400 ho...

Deadline July 31, but only 350 of 9,000 Maharashtra builders sign up with RERA

MUMBAI: Around 9,000 builders  in the state are expected to register their projects under the  MahaRERA, but only 350 of them have done so since May 1, when the regulations came into effect, reveal MahaRERA authorities. The deadline for registration is July 31. If builders don't register their projects, they face fine under the RERA and even a jail term in case of repeat offence. Industry experts say the poor registration rate might be an effect of the slow pace of construction projects and absence of new launches. Around 80,000 residential units remain unsold in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, which is second after the National Capital Region which has 1.6 lakh unsold units. Explaining the current situation, Ramesh Nair chairman of CII Realty and Infrastructure Conclave and CEO & Country Head, JLL India, said, "The number of new launches has come down and the focus has shifted to completion of existing projects. The profitability has f...